Reader’s Question:
My brother needs all the help he can get in his DUI case here in Washington, DC. We are trying to find out how we can challenge the evidence against him so that we can prove that he was really not under the influence when he was arrested. How can we prove that the results in the field sobriety tests and blood test were wrong?
Neo
Washington, DC
Saying that a person who was arrested for DUI was not really under the influence when he was arrested is one thing, and proving it is another thing. There are numerous ways that your brother can prove that he is innocent of the DUI charge against him. He could be able to employ a lot of strong defenses to produce a winning outcome for his DUI case in Washington, DC.
Your brother can prove that the blood alcohol test was inaccurate if his blood alcohol concentration was still rising when the test was conducted. It is very important to remember that the blood alcohol test is supposed to measure the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at the time the driver was operating his or her motor vehicle, not the driver’s BAC after. That means there could be a significant difference between a driver’s BAC at the time of driving and the driver’s BAC at the time the test is taken. With regard to the field sobriety tests (FST), there are several reasons a person may be unable to complete the tests to the standards of police officers. These common reasons include poor lighting, poor coordination, lack of instruction, poor instruction, slippery roads or other physical impairments. Because of that, the results of most FST’s are inaccurate and should always be challenged.
Tags: DUI, DUI advice, DUI lawyer

